How professors think : inside the curious world of academic judgment /
Judging quality isn't robotically rational; it's emotional, cognitive, and social, too. Yet most academics' self-respect is rooted in their ability to analyze complexity and recognize quality, in order to come to the fairest decisions about that elusive god, "excellence." In...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 图书 |
| 语言: | English |
| 出版: |
Cambridge, Mass. :
Harvard University Press,
2009.
|
| 主题: | |
| 标签: |
添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
|
| LEADER | 01665cam a2200301 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 011809434-3 | ||
| 005 | 20160108030943.0 | ||
| 008 | 080723s2009 mau b 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | |a 2008031423 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780674032668 (cloth : alk. paper) | ||
| 035 | 0 | |a ocn237048345 | |
| 040 | |a DLC |c DLC | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | |a LB2333 |b .L36 2009 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 | |a 378.1/2 |2 22 |
| 100 | 1 | |a Lamont, Michèle, |d 1957- | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How professors think : |b inside the curious world of academic judgment / |c Michèle Lamont. |
| 260 | |a Cambridge, Mass. : |b Harvard University Press, |c 2009. | ||
| 300 | |a 330 p. ; |c 22 cm. | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (p. 289-315) and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Opening the black box of peer review -- How panels work -- On disciplinary cultures -- Pragmatic fairness : customary rules of deliberation -- Recognizing various kinds of excellence -- Considering interdisciplinarity and diversity -- Implications in the United States and abroad. | |
| 520 | |a Judging quality isn't robotically rational; it's emotional, cognitive, and social, too. Yet most academics' self-respect is rooted in their ability to analyze complexity and recognize quality, in order to come to the fairest decisions about that elusive god, "excellence." In How Professors Think, Lamont aims to illuminate the confidential process of evaluation and to push the gatekeepers to both better understand and perform their role. --from publisher description. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a College teachers |x Rating of. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Peer review. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Teacher effectiveness. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Portfolios in education. | |
| 730 | 0 | |a ebrary. |5 net | |
| 988 | |a 20090120 | ||
| 906 | |0 DLC | ||