The moral fool : a case for amorality /
An expert on Eastern philosophies and social systems theory, Hans-Georg Moeller questions the perceived goodness of morality and those who claim morality is inherently positive. Critiquing the ethical "fanaticism" of Western moralists, such as Immanuel Kant, Lawrence Kohlberg, John Rawls,...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 图书 |
| 语言: | English |
| 出版: |
New York :
Columbia University Press,
c2009.
|
| 主题: | |
| 标签: |
添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
|
| LEADER | 02815cam a22003854a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 012016059-5 | ||
| 005 | 20090909151152.0 | ||
| 008 | 081201s2009 nyu b 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | |a 2008050513 | ||
| 015 | |a GBA927359 |2 bnb | ||
| 016 | 7 | |a 014931541 |2 Uk | |
| 020 | |a 9780231145084 (cloth : alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | |a 9780231145091 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | |z 9780231519243 (e-book) | ||
| 020 | |a 023114508X (cloth : alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | |a 0231145098 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | |z 0231519249 (e-book) | ||
| 035 | 0 | |a ocn282950987 | |
| 040 | |a DLC |c DLC |d BTCTA |d YDXCP |d UKM |d C#P |d BWX |d ABG |d CDX | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | |a HM665 |b .M633 2009 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 | |a 171/.7 |2 22 |
| 100 | 1 | |a Moeller, Hans-Georg, |d 1964- | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The moral fool : |b a case for amorality / |c Hans-Georg Moeller. |
| 260 | |a New York : |b Columbia University Press, |c c2009. | ||
| 300 | |a x, 212 p. ; |c 21 cm. | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (p. [189]-201) and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Is it good to be good? -- On amorality. The moral fool ; Negative ethics A pathology of ethics. The redundancy of ethics ; The "morality of anger" ; Ethics and aesthetics ; The presumptions of philosophical ethics ; The myth of moral progress -- Ethics in contemporary society. For the separation of morality and law ; Morality and civil rights ; How to get a death verdict ; Masters of war ; Ethics and the mass media -- Applied amorality. | |
| 520 | |a An expert on Eastern philosophies and social systems theory, Hans-Georg Moeller questions the perceived goodness of morality and those who claim morality is inherently positive. Critiquing the ethical "fanaticism" of Western moralists, such as Immanuel Kant, Lawrence Kohlberg, John Rawls, and the utilitarians, Moeller points to the absurd fundamentalisms and impracticable prescriptions arising from definitions of good. Instead he advances a theory of "moral foolishness," or moral asceticism, extracted from the "amoral" philosophers of East Asia and such thinkers as Ludwig Wittgenstein and Niklas Luhman. The moral fool doesn't understand why ethics are necessarily good, and he isn't convinced that the moral perspective is always positive. In this way he is like most people, and Moeller defends this foolishness against ethical pathologies that support the death penalty, just wars, and even Jerry Springer's crude moral theater. Comparing and contrasting the religious philosophies of Christianity, Daoism, and Zen Buddhism, Moeller presents a persuasive argument in favor of amorality. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Social ethics. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Moral conditions. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Social values. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Online version: |a Moeller, Hans-Georg, 1964- |t Moral fool. |d New York : Columbia University Press, ©2009 |w (OCoLC)682333191 |
| 988 | |a 20090630 | ||
| 049 | |a HLSS | ||
| 906 | |0 DLC | ||