Project experts’ evaluation study based on analytic hierarchy process
To assure justice and fair of scientific and technological project evaluation, avoiding the corrupt transaction in the process of project evaluation, it is necessary to evaluate the experts’ performance with a scientific method. The main criteria such as publications, patents and awards, internation...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Published: |
2010
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/4090/ http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/4090/1/Project_Experts%E2%80%99_Evaluation_Study_Based_on_Analytic_Hierarchy_Process_Full_.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | To assure justice and fair of scientific and technological project evaluation, avoiding the corrupt transaction in the process of project evaluation, it is necessary to evaluate the experts’ performance with a scientific method. The main criteria such as publications, patents and awards, international effects, domestic effects, social effects and etc that affect the project evaluation were analyzed. In order to avoid the effect of individual expert subjective judgment and favouritism on the project evaluation, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is introduced. AHP is widely used in comparing the options in order to achieve the goal. For the application of AHP in project evaluation, the 1 Malaysia values such as the culture of excellence, endurance, humility, acceptance, loyalty, meritocracy and integrity are chosen to be the criteria. This paper presents the theory of the alternative method to evaluate the scientific and technological project. The study provides a scientific and reliable method of the project experts’ evaluation. |
|---|