Corporate governance practices and firm performance: evidence from top 100 public listed companies in Malaysia
Corporate governance practices have been a concerned issue by many Asian countries after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997 including Malaysia. Due to the crisis, Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (MCCG) has been introduced as part of the Bursa Malaysia (BMB) listing rules. This study hence foc...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Elsevier B.V.
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/8531/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Corporate governance practices have been a concerned issue by many Asian countries after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997
including Malaysia. Due to the crisis, Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (MCCG) has been introduced as part of the
Bursa Malaysia (BMB) listing rules. This study hence focuses on corporate governance practices among Top 100 public listed
companies in Bursa Malaysia and the relationship between corporate governance practices with firm performance. Two corporate
governance’s indicators (Board size and Board Independence) were chosen in testing the hypothesized relationship between
corporate governance practices with firm performance, which was measured by return on asset (ROA) and return on equity
(ROE). Descriptive and correlation analysis were used to examine the hypotheses in this study. The result showed that board size
has significantly weak negative relationship with ROA but it was found to be insignificant to ROE. The other finding indicated
that there was no relationship between board independence and firm performance. This study provide useful information for
policy makers or regulators in improving the corporate governance policies in the future and also helps in increasing
understanding on the relationship between corporate governance practices and firm’s performance. |
|---|