Comparing forecasting performances between multilayer feedforward neural network and recurrent neural network in Malaysia's load

This paper presents the use of two artificial neural networks models, namely the multilayer feedforward neural network (MLFF) and the recurrent neural network (RNN) are applied for Malaysia’s load forecasting. For this purpose, a half hourly load data is divided equally into three distinct sets for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed, Norizan, Ahmad, Maizah Hura, Ismail, Zuhaimy, Arshad, Khairil Anuar
Format: Article
Published: Taru Publications 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/25936/
http://eprints.utm.my/25936/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper presents the use of two artificial neural networks models, namely the multilayer feedforward neural network (MLFF) and the recurrent neural network (RNN) are applied for Malaysia’s load forecasting. For this purpose, a half hourly load data is divided equally into three distinct sets for training, validation and testing. We use backpropagation as the learning algorithm and the sigmoid function as the transfer function for both hidden land output layers. The forecasting performances of were compared between these two models. We use the sum squared error (SSE) as the measure of performance and the correlation coefficient r , as the measure of relationship between the actual and the predicted values. Results show that, multilayer feedforward neural network (MLFF) and recurrent neural network (RNN) have comparable accuracy but the sum squared error for multilayer feedforward neural network (MLFF) is lower, thus making it better model than recurrent neural network (RNN).