Surfactant alternating carbonated water (SACW) is a new process forenhanced oil recovery
Surfactant alternating carbonated water (SACW) injection is a novel mode for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR), a method to produce residual oil by injecting surfactant solution slug followed by carbonated water slug. Dissolving carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in brine water injection may overcome the shortcomings...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Published: |
ISS
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/66637/ http://eprints.utm.my/66637/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Surfactant alternating carbonated water (SACW) injection is a novel mode for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR), a method to produce residual oil by injecting surfactant solution slug followed by carbonated water slug. Dissolving carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in brine water injection may overcome the shortcomings that seriously associate with the tertiary process of CO 2 injection such as high CO 2 mobility, viscous fingering and gravity override, and poor weep efficiency. The surfactant solution (S) slug alternating carbonated water (CW) slug might reduce the gas mobility at displacement front and retard CO 2 breakthrough. In addition, surfactant and CO 2 can reduce interfacial tension between oil and water reservoir? . The sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS) surfactant was used in surfactant flooding. In addition, the sand pack flooding experiments has been performed in this work. Glass beads were packed into 34.5 cm length and 3.8 cm diameter of stainless steel tube (sand pack) with small holes in both sides. The synthesized sodium chloride solution (brine water) and crude oil saturated the sand pack to establish S wi and S oi . Thereafter, the sand pack was aged at reservoir temperature of 60 o C and pressure of 2500 psi for 4 days to create actual oil reservoir conditions. Furthermore, different injection strategies were carried out including with different slug sizes in pore volume ( PV ) of SACW such as 0.25 PV (S) followed by 0.75 PV (CW), 0.5 PV (S) followed by 0.5PV (CW) and 0.75 PV (S) followed by 0.25 PV (CW) in order to find out the optimum injection strategy to obtain the highest oil recovery factor. The obtained results illustrated that the scenario of 0.75 PV of surfactant slug alternating 0.25 PV of carbonated water showed the highest oil recovery fact or of 86.58%. This is may be attributed to the efficiency of surfactant slug is higher than carbonated water slug. |
|---|