Project experts’ evaluation based on analytic hierarchy process
To assure justice and science of scientific and technological project evaluation, avoiding the corrupt transaction in the process of project evaluation, it is necessary to evaluation the experts’ performance with a scientific method. The main factors criteria such as publications, patents and a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Other |
| Published: |
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/3081/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | To assure justice and science of scientific and
technological project evaluation, avoiding the corrupt
transaction in the process of project evaluation, it is
necessary to evaluation the experts’ performance with a
scientific method. The main factors criteria such as publications, patents and awards, international effects, domestic effects, social effects and etc that effect the project evaluation were analyzed. In order to avoid the effect of individual expert subjected judgement and favouritism on the project evaluation, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is introduced. AHP is widely used in comparing the options in order to achieve the goal. For the application of AHP in project evaluation, the 1 Malaysia values such as the culture of excellence, endurance, humility, acceptance loyalty, meritocracy and integrity are chosen to be the criteria. This paper presents the theory of the alternative method to evaluate the scientific and technological project. The study provides a scientific and reliable method of the project experts' evaluation. |
|---|